 |
“Why Use
the Builder’s Title Company?”
|
|
Victor
Rzepecki
|
|
The
foregoing question has been asked by many buyers and their agents. The purpose of this article is to give you
enough background information to enable you, the agent or the buyer to draw
your own logical conclusion.
The
purchase of real estate is the single largest investment most people will ever
make. In this regard, there are many
legal issues that need to be addressed prior to the builder ever “planting its
shovel” into the ground. Most people today live in a subdivision, or a planned
community, which in many cases was developed by one or multiple home builders.
Title
Companies are one of many professional participants in the development
process. Unlike personal property, real
property is subject to a vast array of rights beyond the owner. These rights affecting title to the real
estate are often referred to as encumbrances, which can be monetary or
non-monetary. From the time a Patent is
issued from a State or the United States, or acquired by Land Grant or other
Congressional Acts, title to land can be subjected to all kinds of encumbrances
and other legal concerns.
Let
us focus on some of the issues title companies, developers and attorneys are
frequently faced with. For example,
down through the decades prior to now, various easements may have been
granted. Some of the recorded easements
fail to include a legal description for the exact location of the easement. These are often referred to as “blanket
easements.” The title company also
discovered the acreage to be developed is subject to some outstanding
fractional interests held by prior parties (now deceased) and there has never
been any probate to distribute title to the appropriate successors. Ten years ago, one of the prior owners filed
bankruptcy in another State, the records of which are not available for review
locally. Last but not least, the
property to be developed into a subdivision was created by “assemblage.” One of the parcels making up the “project”
says it is to be used for “religious purposes only and any other use will cause
the title to revert back to the grantor.”
The
foregoing issues are not fiction, rather they are dealt with on a regular
basis. In most cases the builder, their
attorneys and “their title company” have worked months in addressing and
resolving these many concerns to the point where a parcel of land is suitable
for development and meets the requirements of some local governmental agency.
If some title issues can not be totally cured, title
companies also provide affirmative protection over some matters in the form of
an endorsement to a policy of title insurance.
These endorsements require careful and thorough risk analysis by
the title company Underwriter and issues are normally “underwritten” on a case
by case basis. While title companies
will undertake some risk, the nature of our business and product involves risk
reduction rather than risk assumption.
Often the “builder’s title company” has decided to underwrite the risk
as a “business” decision, whereas another title company not having the same
business relationship with the builder would not be inclined to provide
protection to a buyer from the builder.
The area of title underwriting is quite subjective and generally title
companies don’t have to assume any risk they are uncomfortable with.
Developing
acres of land into a desirable, marketable residential subdivision requires the
expenditure of significant time and capital.
In many cases a return on the time and expense incurred by the title
company is not realized until the builder begins closing sales on its
homes. This lag time on return can be
months and in some cases a couple of years.
The title industry takes a significant business risk in providing significant
services with the objective of writing title insurance and providing escrow
services in the end. The same is true
of agents working with buyers for weeks or months. A level of commitment is to be expected. Absent some degree of builder “loyalty,” let
us consider a couple more reasons for using the “builder’s title company.”
As
mentioned earlier, title companies underwrite risk on a case by case
basis. This underwriting process is
time consuming and usually requires the gathering of significant information
from different sources. In addition
thereto, many issues require research of case law, statutes, both State and
Federal that are germane to the concern.
Upon completion of the research, an underwriting decision is made. Builders must also provide title companies
with documentation regarding authority to execute documents. Such documentation often include: Corporate
Resolutions, Operating Agreements, Financial Statements and Indemnities. Special or unique disbursement instructions
may be in place, to facilitate efficient transfer of proceeds. The “builder’s title company” has
coordinated all of the many issues with the builder and all the other
participants that may be “behind the scene.”
Buyers
and their agents need to be cognizant of the complexities that can exist in a
project. Insisting that the parties use
“another” title company, which is totally unfamiliar with the history of title,
lacks authority documents, special instructions, may be unwilling to accept an
indemnity from the builder, or requires “mounds of paper” to make its own
underwriting determination, will usually result in delay of the closing. This brings us to what I believe is the most
important reason to consider using the “builders title company.”
Builders
have two primary objectives: a) build a product that consumers want to have and
b) get consumers into their home as soon as possible, with everyone getting
paid! Title companies want to see deals
close on time and as efficiently as possible.
I believe agents want to see their clients enjoy their dream home and
get paid their hard earned commission.
How do we increase the probability of attaining most of these goals?
A)___, by using the builder’s title company, or
B)___ by using a title company that has no knowledge or understanding of the
project, lacks documentation in order to make an informed decision, and has no
business commitment to the builder as it is not their customer. (check
one) Want to get the deal closed with
as few hassles as possible? Make the logical
choice!
Victor Rzepecki is Vice President of Underwriting in
Arizona and represents Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company, Lawyers Title
Insurance Corporation and Transnation Title Insurance Company all three being
national title insurance companies, providing real estate-related products and
services on commercial and residential transactions in the United States,
Canada, Mexico, the Caribbean and South America. LandAmerica Financial Group,
Inc is the holding company. Questions
or comments can be sent to vrzepecki@landam.com